Supercharge your JavaScript: Practical Patterns from “Supercharge your JavaScript” by Nico Reindl (DEVJobs.at)

What we watched and why it matters

In “Supercharge your JavaScript,” Nico Reindl (DEVJobs.at) ran through about 15 pragmatic tips aimed at making everyday JavaScript faster to write and easier to read. Rather than live‑coding, he presented tight screenshots, underlining the key bits in red so the lesson pops immediately. The overall tone is practical and opinionated: use small, composable language features to reduce boilerplate and make intent obvious.

Three areas dominate the session:

• The spread operator (those three dots) across objects, arrays, and function arguments.
• The ternary operator, logical AND, and logical OR for concise control flow.
• A “question mark” approach to avoid sprawling chains of undefined checks on deeply nested data.

Plus, a handful of small, useful tricks—like cutting an array down to just the first few items. The examples are intentionally simple (a pet with name/type/size, banana varieties, a multiplication function, even a Batman cue) so the patterns, not the domain, take center stage. Below is our DEVJobs.at editorial recap of what we heard and how it translates into better day‑to‑day JavaScript.

The spread operator: three dots with outsized impact

Nico spends significant time on the spread operator because those three dots unlock several common operations without ceremony.

Extend, override, and merge objects

The baseline example: you have an object (a pet with a name), and you want to add type and size. Instead of assigning fields one by one, you “spread out” the existing object into a new one and place the added fields alongside it. The benefits are immediate:

• The pattern is visually clear: carry over the base data, then add or override fields.
• You avoid repetitive assignments—especially when a separate “attributes” object already holds the extra fields.

When two objects—say a pet and pet attributes—need to be combined, that spread‑and‑merge shape is, in Nico’s words, a lifesaver for large structures. It compresses what would otherwise be tedious and error‑prone glue code.

Destructure selectively and keep “the rest”

Nico highlights another angle: destructuring a few fields while gathering everything else via the three dots. This lets you explicitly pull out, for example, size and color while keeping the remainder together. The practical upshot is that you can effectively “remove” certain fields without mutating the original object. His guidance is straightforward: it’s useful, he uses it all the time, and it keeps object manipulation clean.

Spread arrays instead of looping

On arrays, the same principle applies. Nico uses banana varieties to keep it concrete (including the fun aside that red bananas exist). Rather than iterating to push items from one array into another, you spread multiple arrays into a new one. In addition:

• You can place items at the beginning or end with equal ease.
• Rearrangements become simple compositions of spreads rather than bespoke loops.

The net effect is less boilerplate and more intention: you can see in one place exactly which sequences are being combined and how.

Functions: accept flexible argument lists and spread arrays into calls

Nico walks through a multiplication function that initially takes three arguments. The question arises: what if you want to multiply two values—or ten? The fix is to rewrite the function to accept a variable number of arguments. That works hand in hand with spread at the call site:

• The function collects however many values are passed.
• Callers can spread an existing array of numbers directly into the argument list.

Nico’s verdict: it saves a lot of time because you avoid intermediary transformations or custom loops just to adapt to the function’s signature.

Ternary, AND, OR: concise control flow you’ll actually read

The next cluster covers three operators that replace small if statements elegantly and predictably.

Ternary operator: compact if‑then‑else

Introduced simply as “the question mark,” the ternary pattern replaces multi‑line if‑else blocks with a short expression. Nico uses it both for logging (“big” vs “small”) and for assigning a variable based on a size threshold. The motivation is consistent: reduce the number of tiny if statements to improve readability. Smaller can be clearer when the intent is simple.

Logical AND: conditional execution

The Batman example sticks: if Batman is coming, play the theme; otherwise, do nothing. Rather than an if, express it with logical AND. It conveys “only if” precisely and avoids side effects like logging or returning undefined. The result is both shorter and cleaner.

Logical OR: clean fallbacks when a value is undefined

Nico shows how explicit undefined checks quickly look noisy. Using OR to provide a fallback reads cleaner in a single line. It is one of his go‑to cleanup tricks because it compresses a common pattern—“use the value if it is there, otherwise use this other one”—into an easily scannable shape.

Stop the undefined ladders: the question mark to the rescue

One of Nico’s strongest opinions targets deeply nested access with endless guards. You want to check whether a field way down the chain is greater than 10. The naive route involves verifying each intermediate link isn’t undefined. Layer in nested if‑else statements and the code becomes unwieldy fast. His plea:

Instead, he points to a “question mark” approach to cut the chain down dramatically. The result is smaller code and higher readability—exactly the theme of the talk. The spirit is pragmatic rather than theoretical: fewer moving parts, less visual noise, and a much lower chance of overlooking a missing guard or making a typo.

A handy mini‑trick: keep just the first few array items

Nico also shares a quick array trick: when you only want the first few numbers, adjust the size of the array—his example uses three—and the structure immediately reflects the subset. The recording cuts off as he says “and now the array is…,” but the point is clear: a small, focused move lets you trim an array to the portion you actually need without a loop.

What ties these examples together

Across different contexts, Nico’s patterns share the same DNA:

• Brevity over ceremony: when one line suffices, he favors it over multiple.
• Readability first: every transformation clarifies intent rather than obscuring it.
• Reusable building blocks: spreading objects and arrays, collecting arguments, and providing fallbacks are all portable moves you can apply anywhere.
• Practicality over novelty: the examples are simple by design to encourage adoption.

This is not a tour of niche language corners. It is a toolbox for the work most of us do every day.

Typical pitfalls these patterns defuse

Even without a catalog of counterexamples, the risks Nico is addressing are familiar:

• Repetitive object merges: spreads align with how we think about “base plus overrides,” eliminating boilerplate assignments.
• Loops for trivial array operations: spreading saves you from manual iteration when you’re just combining lists or grafting on items.
• Rigid function signatures: collecting arguments and spreading arrays removes pressure to write one‑off wrappers.
• The “undefined ladder” in nested data: a question mark form shortens entire chains of guards into a single, readable access.
• If‑else for micro‑decisions: ternary, AND, and OR express straightforward logic in place.

The shared outcome is higher signal‑to‑noise: intent up front, mechanics in the background.

How we would fold these habits into a team workflow

At DEVJobs.at, we bias toward clarity and consistency in reviews. Nico’s patterns slot neatly into that mindset. A practical rollout could look like this:

1. Make spreading the default for merging objects—especially when augmenting base configuration with additional fields.
2. Prefer spreading to combine arrays and to attach items at the head or tail; reserve loops for cases that genuinely require element‑wise logic.
3. Normalize function signatures where a variable number of values makes sense, and spread arrays at call sites to avoid glue code.
4. Encourage ternary, AND, and OR as legitimate, readable one‑liners for logging, defaults, and small decisions.
5. Adopt the question mark pattern for nested access to replace long chains of undefined checks.
6. Document tiny array moves (like trimming to the first N entries) to make them easily discoverable during code reviews.

The balancing act is straightforward: short forms should increase clarity, not decrease it. Nico’s examples are helpful because they keep the problem space simple and the intent front and center.

Lines that stick

• “The spread operator can be very useful.”
• “It’s a very good lifesaver if you have huge objects.”
• “Use it all the time—it’s amazing.” (on destructuring with the rest of the object)
• “One of the biggest cleanup tricks I do all the time—I can’t live without it.” (on cutting undefined chains with a question mark)
• “Don’t do it, please.” (on nesting if‑else statements)

They all orbit the same idea: more signal, less noise.

Actionable takeaways for your next commit

• Reach for the three dots as your default tool for objects, arrays, and function calls—you’ll write less glue and make intent explicit.
• Replace tiny if blocks with ternary, AND, and OR where appropriate—shorter without being cryptic.
• Cut deep access chains with the question mark approach—your future self will thank you when scanning the code.
• Keep small array tricks in your pocket to avoid unnecessary loops when you only need a slice.
• Think of object updates as “base plus targeted additions”—that matches Nico’s spread pattern and keeps structure clear.

Final thoughts

“Supercharge your JavaScript” by Nico Reindl (DEVJobs.at) isn’t about flashy language corners; it’s a field guide to the small, repeatable moves that make everyday JavaScript better. The star players are the spread operator, the question mark shortcuts, and the logical operators that replace boilerplate if statements. The throughline is unmistakable: less code, clearer intent.

Make these patterns habitual and you don’t just type faster—you communicate faster. That’s the real “supercharge” for JavaScript teams: turning common tasks into single, legible moves that leave room for the work that actually needs your attention.

• 

  

  Die TechTalk Days

  Klemens Schreiber erzählt in seinem devjobs.at TechTalk den Werdegang des Karriereportals und den Hintergrund der TechTalk Days.

  Watch now
• 

  

  Decentralized Web Magic

  Nico Reindl zeigt in seinem devjobs.at TechTalk das Prinzip der Decentralization anhand von Hash Functions und Merkle Trees.

  Watch now

• 

  

  Nico Reindl, Full Stack Developer bei devjobs.at

  Nico Reindl von devjobs.at erzählt im Interview über seinen Werdegang als Full Stack Developer, was die Challenges in seiner Arbeit sind und gibt Tipps zur Weiterentwicklung.

  Watch now