From Mechatronics to Cloud Backends: Lessons from Matthias Thym (smaXtec) on System Engineering, Kubernetes, and Precise Problem‑Solving

A non‑linear path that delivers: Recapping the session “Matthias Thym, Back End & System Engineer bei smaXtec”

In the session “Matthias Thym, Back End & System Engineer bei smaXtec,” Matthias Thym traces a career that didn’t begin in computer science—and that’s precisely why it resonates with so many developers. He spent five years at an HTL focused on mechatronics, a “colorful mix” where programming was not the main focus. Still, that’s where he first got into coding: C on microcontrollers. Later, as studies and side projects piled up, he realized other languages suited him better and transitioned toward Python. Today, he works in the System & Infrastructure Team at smaXtec animal care GmbH, where the company runs on the cloud and “a lot of Kubernetes” is involved.

What makes his story valuable is not a checklist of tools, but a clear view of how to approach engineering work: identify problems—even when you don’t know the cause—and solve them “as quickly, as precisely, and as efficiently as possible.” That pragmatic mindset shapes his story and offers concrete guidance for anyone moving into backend and system‑level roles.

An HTL in mechatronics: Breadth as a starting advantage

Matthias’s technical start was a five‑year HTL program in mechatronics. It wasn’t a computer science track, yet it opened the door to programming. That matters. Mechatronics naturally combines mechanics, electronics, and software, helping students build a holistic, systems‑level understanding. When you learn to code there, you tend to learn it under constraints—close to hardware, where correctness and predictability are non‑negotiable.

His early coding lived at the edge of the physical world: microcontrollers, C, limited resources. That environment teaches lessons that echo throughout a career:

• Impact is immediate: code drives real devices.
• Failures are tangible: lights, sensors, actuators—feedback is direct.
• Precision matters: “good enough” is rarely good enough.

This background helps explain why, later on, Matthias emphasizes accuracy so strongly. If you cut your teeth in environments where ambiguity causes real‑world issues, you carry that intolerance for vagueness into backend and platform work.

From C to Python: Choosing tools that fit how you think

As his studies progressed and side projects grew, Matthias shifted to Python and other languages. The reason is deceptively simple: C didn’t suit him as well as other options. Instead of clinging to his first language, he aligned his toolset with how he worked best.

There’s a powerful lesson in that move:

• Technology choices should align with fit and purpose. If a language doesn’t click, switching is not only allowed—it’s smart.
• Side projects are a leverage point. They let you experiment beyond a curriculum and gather real comparative experience.
• Careers evolve along a continuum: from embedded contexts to higher‑level abstractions, from low‑level C to productive, expressive tools like Python.

The deeper point: expertise doesn’t come from holding on to one tool. It comes from selecting the right tool—and having the courage to change it when necessary.

Landing in System & Infrastructure: Cloud reality, Kubernetes in practice

“I’ve been at smaXtec for half a year now,” Matthias says. He describes a backend split between an Integration Team and a System & Infrastructure Team. He works in the latter—with a focused mandate:

• Keep the infrastructure up and current.
• Provision new servers when necessary.
• “By now, everything is in the cloud, with a lot of Kubernetes.”
• Handle the “general system‑relevant” duties that must run reliably.
• Set up new internal services the company needs.

This paints a picture of work you rarely notice when it’s done well—and that’s the point. Infrastructure is good when it’s invisible because it just works. Updates, server provisioning, cluster operations, internal services: these are the pillars that product teams, data flows, and integrations stand on.

What stands out is how matter‑of‑fact his description is. No gratuitous name‑dropping. No buzzwords for their own sake. Cloud and Kubernetes appear as means to an end—exactly how they should in professional environments.

The sister discipline: Integration as the bridge to partners

While his team provides the backbone, the Integration Team builds bridges: “integrations with other companies we cooperate with,” managing data exchange. This division of labor is typical of mature backend organizations:

• System & Infrastructure: operations, platform, internal services, reliability.
• Integration: interfaces, partners, data flows, compatibility.

Each depends on the other. Stable integrations rely on a stable platform. Platform work earns its value when integrations and product features run safely on top. Matthias’s description makes that interplay tangible.

The core of the job: Spot issues, isolate causes, fix with speed and accuracy

On the question of prerequisites and mindset, Matthias is blunt: you need a genuine passion for solving problems and “for identifying problems beforehand.” Often the starting signal is just a faint hint: “you learn that there is a problem by whatever means,” and “you might not know the cause.” That’s exactly when professionalism shows: “you have to make sure it gets solved as quickly, as precisely, and as efficiently as possible.”

Those three adverbs distill a lot of practice:

• As quickly as possible: responsiveness without chaos—speed that reduces impact.
• As precisely as possible: not just nudging symptoms but acting on causes with clear effect.
• As efficiently as possible: using time, attention, and infrastructure wisely.

Operate that way and you build trust—with customers, colleagues, and partners. The strength isn’t the number of tools applied, but the consistency of solving problems well.

Practical habits that fit this mindset

Drawing directly from Matthias’s framing, the following habits align with that ethos:

• Early signal handling: treat hints seriously even when the cause is unknown.
• Hypothesis‑driven steps: narrow the search systematically rather than trial‑and‑error.
• Incremental changes: small, verifiable interventions with clear feedback.
• Keep a running record: what you observed, what you changed, what the effect was.
• Close the loop: verify the fix, check for side effects, and capture the learning.

This approach is technology‑agnostic. It works in embedded contexts and in Kubernetes clusters alike.

Education helps—but initiative matters more

“A degree isn’t strictly required, but it certainly helps.” Matthias also avoids one‑size‑fits‑all thinking about study paths: “from HTL to FH and university, but also career changers—anyone can learn this in principle; you need a certain level of initiative.”

That last phrase is the real key: initiative. It shows up throughout his story—starting programming in an HTL where it wasn’t the main focus, exploring new languages in side projects, tackling problems with unclear causes at work. Initiative is the thread that makes formal titles secondary, provided you seek out practice.

What that means for your choices

• HTL, FH, university: all are viable. The essential question is whether you’ll have room to solve problems independently.
• Career change: feasible if you actively close gaps—through projects, learning sprints, and real practice.
• Degrees as leverage: helpful for structure, exposure, and depth—not as a badge of legitimacy.

From embedded roots to cloud operations: Breadth as a competitive edge

The stations Matthias mentions—microcontrollers with C, later Python, and now cloud and Kubernetes—sketch a line from the close‑to‑the‑metal to platform‑level abstractions. The result is an engineering profile that operates across layers, from bits to platforms. In modern backend environments, that breadth is a real advantage.

• Embedded experience wrestles comfortably with resource limits and timing.
• Python brings speed in building tools, services, and automation.
• Cloud and Kubernetes demand platform thinking and operational discipline.

Breadth isn’t a goal in itself; it’s how you solve problems holistically—choosing the right layer for a fix, whether it’s configuration, code, or infrastructure.

Speed, precision, efficiency: A three‑word operating model

Matthias’s explicit trio can be read as an operating model:

• Speed: detect issues early, prioritize, and act.
• Precision: isolate causes, sharpen error patterns, measure effects.
• Efficiency: aim for maximum impact with appropriate effort.

In practice, this implies a bias for the right level of automation, the right tools, and the right standardization—not more, not less. Professionalism is the balance.

The team dimension: Shared responsibility for stability and exchange

The split Matthias describes highlights how critical clear team boundaries are—and how interdependent they remain. System & Infrastructure provides internal reliability; Integration creates external connectivity. Both are required to deliver value. Especially in a setup where “everything is in the cloud” and there’s “a lot of Kubernetes,” shared expectations and interfaces matter: What services does the platform provide? What operational qualities do integrations depend on? How are changes coordinated? Even if Matthias doesn’t spell out those processes, his description points straight at that seam where good engineering becomes visible.

Practical guidance emerging from this journey

Without inflating the story or importing external details, Matthias’s path offers direct, actionable guidance:

1. Follow fit, not inertia: if a language doesn’t suit you, switch. Starting in C and moving to Python is a legitimate, effective path.
2. Use side projects intentionally: they let you test new directions and discover strengths.
3. Practice problem detection: pay attention to signals—alerts, feedback, symptoms—even when root causes are unclear.
4. Train the trio of speed, precision, efficiency: act fast, be exact, and conserve resources.
5. Build breadth: hardware‑adjacent experience, programming fluency, and platform operations all sharpen judgment.
6. Choose your education path pragmatically: HTL, FH, university, or a career change—many roads work, provided you bring initiative.

A note on tone: Sober, accountable, and deliberately unflashy

What stood out in this session is the sobriety of its framing. No theatrics. No buzzwords beyond what’s required to describe the work. The focus stays on what must happen for systems to run: set up, update, keep things operating; integrate with partners; identify and fix problems. That quiet intensity is its own signal of quality. It points to a craft built on routine, prioritization, and a willingness to own outcomes.

Closing thoughts: A pragmatic compass for backend and infrastructure careers

The session “Matthias Thym, Back End & System Engineer bei smaXtec” doesn’t chase the newest hype. It offers something more durable: a compass. If you start with a mixed technical background, choose languages that fit you, treat cloud and Kubernetes as means to an end, and solve problems “as quickly, as precisely, and as efficiently as possible,” you’ll build a resilient career in backend and system engineering.

HTL, FH, university, or career change—the route is open if initiative, curiosity, and a bias for real problem‑solving come along. That’s the throughline in Matthias Thym’s journey at smaXtec animal care GmbH. It’s a reminder that in infrastructure, the most important work is often the least visible—and that reliable systems don’t appear by accident. They’re built by people who take responsibility and act with precision.

• 

  

  Manuel Frech, Teamlead Hard- & Firmware bei smaXtec

  Teamlead Hard- & Firmware bei smaXtec Manuel Frech spricht im Interview über den Aufbau der Entwicklungsabteilung, welche Technologien dort im Einsatz sind und wie das Recruiting und Onboarding abläuft.

  Watch now

• 

  

  Johannes Pesenhofer, Data Scientist bei smaXtec

  Johannes Pesenhofer von smaXtec spricht im Interview darüber, wie er zu seiner aktuellen Arbeit als Data Scientist gekommen ist und was seiner Ansicht nach wichtig für Beginner ist.

  Watch now
• 

  

  Oliver Troger, Front End Developer bei smaXtec

  Oliver Troger von smaXtec erzählt im Interview über seinen Werdegang, inklusive Umwegen bis zum Front End Development und gibt Tipps für Neueinsteiger.

  Watch now