Workplace Image CYAN Security Group GmbH

Alexander Zlatnik, Head of Product and Development at CYAN Security Group

Description

By playing the video, you agree to data transfer to YouTube and acknowledge the privacy policy.

Video Summary

In "Alexander Zlatnik, Head of Product and Development at CYAN Security Group," Speaker Alexander Zlatnik outlines his path since 2014 and, as department lead since 2018, how he ensures teams have what they need to deliver roadmap work and projects effectively. He details tightly coordinated development units—a performance-focused filter engine team and another team handling platform customization and partner integrations—with embedded QA “team testers” to keep feedback loops short. The culture emphasizes Agile practices (Scrum/Kanban with two-week planning), quality, and close Dev-QA collaboration, setting expectations for teamwork and rigor while supporting talent through integrated QA and hands-on leadership enablement.

Performance, Quality, and Partner Integration: Inside CYAN Security Group’s Product and Development – Insights from “Alexander Zlatnik, Head of Product and Development at CYAN Security Group”

How the session set the stage

In the session “Alexander Zlatnik, Head of Product and Development at CYAN Security Group” (Speaker: Alexander Zlatnik, Company: CYAN Security Group GmbH), we at DevJobs.at got a focused look at how CYAN structures product and engineering to deliver a platform that detects malicious traffic and integrates cleanly into partner systems. The talk was concise yet revealing: it connected high‑performance engineering with embedded quality assurance and an operational cadence designed for short feedback loops.

What stood out most was the clarity of roles, the emphasis on enabling teams, and the balance between performance‑critical components and partner‑driven customization.

“My main responsibility is to ensure that my teams have everything they need so that they can work in the best possible way on projects and product enhancements.”

Alexander’s journey: from the first product line to leading product and technology

Alexander has been with CYAN for seven years and has led the product and technology department since 2018. He started in 2014 overseeing project and product management, working directly with customers and building the first product line. That origin story continues to shape the organization: close to customers, grounded in partner needs, and evolving the platform along real‑world requirements.

“When I started in 2014, I was responsible for the project and product management department where I was working directly with our customers and created the first product line.”

Over time, the products “evolved very much,” driven by new technology and technical possibilities. The throughline is clear: CYAN doesn’t just ship features; it “trims” core components for efficiency, scalability, and security.

“In the meantime, the products evolved very much also driven by new technology and other technical possibilities.”

Colleagues refer to Alexander as a “Swiss knife.” It hints at cross‑functional pragmatism and a willingness to engage wherever needed. For tech talent, it’s a signal that versatility is respected and interdisciplinary contributions are part of the culture.

The platform: high‑performance filter engines and partner‑ready integration

CYAN’s platform is built by multiple teams working in tight formation. A dedicated group owns the filter engines that detect malicious traffic and are tuned for high performance. Their mandate is optimization and continued development of this engine layer.

“Our filter engines which are detecting malicious traffic are trimmed to be high performance. So a dedicated team is focusing to optimize and develop this part of the software.”

Another team covers the remaining platform areas and is deeply involved in projects that customize the platform for partner‑specific needs. This stream is “critical in terms of quality” because the CYAN platform is connected to partner systems during integration workstreams.

“The other parts of the platform are covered by another team which are very much involved in projects for customizing our platform to cope with specific needs of our partners. Their work is critical in terms of quality because we are connecting the CYAN platform to the systems of our partners within the integration work streams during a project.”

For engineers, this means working on a platform where security and performance are central, and where real‑world integrations are a core part of the delivery. Engine optimization and partner integration together shape the day‑to‑day: deep specialization on one side, customer‑facing adaptation on the other.

Embedded QA: “team testers” and short feedback loops

A defining organizational choice at CYAN is embedding quality assurance within development teams. Alexander describes QA roles as “team testers.” Developers and QA engineers collaborate closely with the explicit goal of keeping feedback cycles short.

“To ensure the quality of our software, we integrated a quality assurance team into the different development teams as so‑called team testers. The developers and QA engineers work closely together to ensure short feedback loops.”

That setup aligns with the platform’s demands in two ways:

  • Performance work benefits from tight loops to validate optimizations quickly.
  • Integration work requires robust quality at every handover, interface, and customization step.

At CYAN, QA isn’t an afterthought; it’s part of how teams build. For talent, this signals shared ownership of quality and the discipline to keep testing close to the code and the use case.

Planning cadence: agile methods, two‑week horizon

To plan team work, CYAN uses “agile methods like Scrum or Kanban” and plans “two weeks in advance.” While the talk didn’t detail individual ceremonies, the two‑week horizon creates a steady operating rhythm.

“For planning the work of the teams, we are using agile methods like Scrum or Kanban and plan the work for two weeks in advance.”

This cadence supports the short feedback loops Alexander emphasizes and provides a reliable frame for both performance optimization and integration tasks. It combines focus with adaptability—fitting for a platform that’s continuously improved.

Leadership stance: enablement, momentum, and partner satisfaction

Alexander’s description of his role is the hallmark of servant leadership: removing obstacles, ensuring teams have what they need, and keeping delivery aligned with roadmaps and partner commitments.

“What I really like about my job is on the one hand the dynamic industry itself where we constantly need to improve our product and on the other hand the mixture of topics where I can contribute and help the different teams at CYAN to satisfy our partners with our products.”

Two takeaways matter for talent:

  • The industry is “dynamic,” and constant product improvement is the norm.
  • The “mixture of topics” keeps the work varied, from high‑performance engines to integration milestones—all in service of partner satisfaction.

Teaming model: specialization, integration, and embedded quality

From Alexander’s outline, the teaming model comes into focus:

  • A dedicated team focuses on the performance‑critical filter engines that detect malicious traffic.
  • Another team covers broader platform components and handles customization for partner needs.
  • QA is embedded as “team testers,” collaborating closely with developers for short feedback loops.

This structure supports:

  • Deep specialization on performance‑sensitive components.
  • Customer‑proximate delivery during integration workstreams.
  • Fast, cross‑functional feedback that keeps quality central throughout.

It’s a model tuned for a platform where reliability and performance aren’t optional, and where partner integrations are a constant.

Engineering culture: performance first, quality together, partner‑centric delivery

Even without exhaustive details, the cultural signals are clear:

  • Performance matters. Filter engines are “trimmed to be high performance.”
  • Quality is a team sport. QA is integrated, not isolated.
  • Partner orientation is day‑to‑day reality. Customization and integrations are core to the work.
  • Planning is deliberate. Agile methods and a two‑week planning horizon provide structure.

These pillars add up to an engineering culture that prioritizes security, speed, and reliability.

Why CYAN is compelling for tech talent

Based on Alexander’s account, several traits make CYAN appealing for engineers, QA professionals, and product leaders:

  • Work at the core: Contribute to a platform whose heart is high‑performance filter engines for detecting malicious traffic.
  • Real‑world integrations: Customization for partner systems is essential work—quality is critical at every stage.
  • Embedded QA: Short feedback loops and shared responsibility for quality within teams.
  • Clear cadence: Two‑week planning with agile methods like Scrum or Kanban provides focus and predictability.
  • Enablement‑focused leadership: A Head of Product and Development intent on giving teams what they need to do their best work.
  • Variety by design: A “mixture of topics” spanning performance, projects, and partner satisfaction.

If you’re looking to combine technical depth with product‑proximate delivery, CYAN offers an environment where both dimensions meet.

Signals of growth and progression

Two points from Alexander’s story speak to growth:

  • Role breadth: He held “several roles during [his] journey,” indicating room to move across responsibilities as the platform evolves.
  • Continuous product evolution: The product “evolved very much,” driven by new technology—working at CYAN means evolving with the platform and its technical possibilities.

Growth here is embedded in practice: as teams build and integrate, responsibilities expand with the product and partner needs.

Key quotes and takeaways

  • “I’m kind of the Swiss knife at CYAN.” — Versatility and cross‑functional contributions.
  • “Our filter engines … are trimmed to be high performance.” — Performance at the core.
  • “Their work is critical in terms of quality …” — Integration requires uncompromising quality.
  • “… integrated a quality assurance team … as so‑called team testers … short feedback loops.” — QA embedded within development teams.
  • “… agile methods like Scrum or Kanban … plan the work for two weeks in advance.” — A steady planning cadence.
  • “… dynamic industry … mixture of topics … satisfy our partners with our products.” — Variety paired with partner focus.

Closing thoughts: A system built on performance, quality, and partner alignment

The insights from “Alexander Zlatnik, Head of Product and Development at CYAN Security Group” paint a picture of an organization aligning product and engineering around three imperatives:

  • High performance in security‑relevant components,
  • Quality as a team principle with short feedback loops,
  • Partner‑centric delivery through focused integration work.

For tech talent who value performance optimization, embedded quality, and the pragmatism of building for real partner environments, CYAN Security Group GmbH offers a structure, cadence, and leadership approach designed to help teams do their best work.

More Tech Lead Stories

More Dev Stories